Iraakse commandant: Amerikanen en Saoedi’s leveren inlichtingen aan Islamitische Staat in Mosul

Met respect; het bericht dat u hier overneemt erg gekleurd, halve waarheden, en duidelijk propaganda. Zou u toch ook direct kunnen vermoeden!?
Iedereen weet nu wel, dat S.A. innig samenwerkt met de Koningshuizen in Europa.
Jawel, m.n. Britse, Nederlandse, Belgische en Noorse Koningshuis.

Had u Lubach dd. 30 oktober gezien, was u op de hoogte geraakt:
Zondag met Lubach Zo 30 okt 2016 21:45 – 22:15
http://www.npo.nl/zondag-met-lubach/30-10-2016/VPWON_1262001

Heb uw bron natuurlijk meteen nagetrokken.
De man wordt betaald door Iran, om in Iraak zgn. Islamterreur op gang te brengen en houden.

Dan weet je dat de CIA en Mossad niet zo’n kans laten lopen om hun plan voor het M.O. te realiseren; Balkanisering – Permanent sectarisch geweld aan de gang houden. ‘Verdeel en HEERS’.

Voor de volledigheid: het initiatief van de CIA bij het opzetten van Al-Qaida, Al-Shabab, Al-Nusra, Boko Haram, Millu Gürus, Privat Sektor, GLADIO21, IS/ISIS/ISIL – kortom terreurgroepen over de hele wereld – is uitvoerig gedocumenteerd.
Valt zonder uzelf belachelijk te maken niet te ontkennen.

Doet (zelfs) de CIA niet (meer):
“More frighteningly, the articles published this week in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Daily News, written by Hoover Institute fellow and AIPAC member, Paul Sperry, now not only blame Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia as the 9/11 mastermind but tie Bush (43) in as well.

In fact, the entire AIPAC apparatus, the largest lobbying organization in Washington, is currently engaged in a “full court press,” to stop congress from pushing for the release of the real report.
Is this because the real report accuses Israel, not Saudi Arabia, and AIPAC wants the Murdoch/Sperry story to stand?
Bin Laden myth “crashes down”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/28/mossad-bush-planned-executed-911/
http://boinnk.nl/125248/schokkende-bericht-van-israels-news-live-israel-embedded-with-iis-in-mosul/
->“the Obama administration’s insistence on continuing to finance and arm the so-called moderate rebel groups.
By then, the CIA had been conspiring for more than a year with allies in the UK, Saudi Arabia and Qatar to ship guns and goods – to be used for the overthrow of Assad – from Libya, via Turkey, into Syria.

The new intelligence estimate singled out Turkey as a major impediment to Obama’s Syria policy.
The document showed, the adviser said, ‘that what was started as a covert US programme to arm and support the moderate rebels fighting Assad had been co-opted by Turkey, and had morphed into an across-the-board technical, arms and logistical programme for all of the opposition, including Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State.

In December 2006, William Roebuck, then in charge of the US embassy in Damascus, filed an analysis of the ‘vulnerabilities’ of the Assad government and listed methods ‘that will improve the likelihood’ of opportunities for destabilisation.
He recommended that Washington work with Saudi Arabia and Egypt to increase sectarian tension and focus on publicising ‘Syrian efforts against extremist groups’ – dissident Kurds and radical Sunni factions – ‘in a way that suggests weakness, signs of instability, and uncontrolled blowback’;
and that the ‘isolation of Syria’ should be encouraged through US support of the National Salvation Front, led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian vice president whose government-in-exile in Riyadh was sponsored by the Saudis and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Another 2006 cable showed that the embassy had spent $5 million financing dissidents”-<
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-hersh/military-to-military